While reading Determining Uses and Gratifications for the Internet, it was obvious that the authors understood how important motivation is to online retailers. By better understanding the reason why people are on the internet, businesses can tailor their offerings towards the consumers they wish to target. The researchers looked at the motivation of internet users via uses and gratifications research that has been used on other forms of media like TV and radio. I personally don’t think that their research produced anything shocking from a 2009 perspective and perhaps only mildly interesting from a 2004 vantage point.
It was refreshing to see that the researchers acknowledged the potential internet usage motivated by social factors. One common problem I encounter when recalling the technology situation from more than a few years ago, is placing too much of an advanced framework on my recollection. I tend to be a very early adopter, so while I might have seen the social nature of the internet in 2004, the vast majority of people probably did not. This article is important in that regard as it is concerned with average internet users and their motivations. The authors broke motivation factors down into two other groups- content and process. Process being the act of searching or surfing the internet and content being the actual media that draws the user to that particular website. I have a problem with breaking these two categories apart and I think it has to do with the survey the researchers conducted to gather data. Using words that people associate with the internet and then asking people to rank those words gives data that says people highly associate “search” with the internet and leads to the hypothesis that people are motivated by the internet process of searching. You almost have to search to get the content you are looking for on the internet, especially in 2009, much less 2004 due to the ever expanding amount of information available. I am concerned that people are confusing the process of searching with what they are really looking for, which is content. While some people may just randomly click on links or type random words into search boxes whereby engaging in the process of the internet, I don’t believe that the average internet user is motivated by the process. Instead, I think they want the content.
Knowing why somebody is using a particular medium is important. If the social component was not a motivating factor, then websites like Amazon would not have user reviews for every product or user profiles. Businesses that attempt to sell products or services online would do well to make an effort to understand the major reasons why somebody is clicking on their front door. Motivation is seems like something that would be difficult to nail down due the changing nature of the internet. I believe the social factor is much more important in 2009 than 2004 and will continue to grow and eventually overshadow process or content.
[...] of thoughtful, reflective essays: Brian, Jeff, Jeremy, Peter, [...]
Pingback by Week 3 - Class Notes « evolution and trends in digital media technologies — January 20, 2009 @ 6:24 pm
Best reflection of the bunch on this article. I appreciate your thoughts about the methodology of the study, ie the survey, and the conclusions you drew about people confusing search and content.
Your writing has a natural flow to it and it’s enjoyable to read. There are some places where it’s hard to follow, a bit of jumping back and forth – sort of like trying to follow someone’s train of thought as they figure out a problem aloud. Consider breaking up your longer paragraphs. Your ideas are worth spending some time with and they’ll stand out better if they get more room to themselves.
Comment by mgm5 — January 21, 2009 @ 10:55 pm
Brian, you probably already figured it out but mgm5 is Meg. I meant to sign my comment to you.
Comment by mgm5 — January 21, 2009 @ 10:56 pm